Beyond ROC-AUC: Decision-Adjusted Analytical Value for Capacity-Constrained Management Analytics under Temporal Distribution Shift

Main Article Content

Kwan Hong Tan

Abstract

Management analytics is commonly evaluated with model-centric statistics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), yet managerial deployment converts scores into costly actions under finite capacity, changing base rates, and asymmetric economic consequences. This study introduces Decision-Adjusted Analytical Value (DAAV), a normalized framework that evaluates a predictive policy against random-capacity and attainable-oracle benchmarks after incorporating an economic action threshold and an operational capacity constraint. The framework is tested on the UCI Bank Marketing dataset using 41,188 chronologically ordered campaign records. To prevent post-contact leakage, call duration is excluded. Logistic regression, random forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models are trained on the first 75% of observations, calibrated on the next 10%, and evaluated on the final 15% temporal holdout. Performance is assessed across 20 benefit-cost and capacity scenarios, with paired nonparametric bootstrapping for the focal policy comparison. The temporal holdout exhibits a pronounced prevalence shift, from 6.8% in validation to 38.5% in testing. Random forest attains the highest ROC-AUC (0.653), but is not the value-maximizing model in 16 of 20 operating scenarios. At a benefit-cost ratio of 3 and 50% capacity, logistic regression produces 226.9 normalized net-value units per 1,000 cases versus 95.6 for random forest; the paired difference is 131.0 units (95% bootstrap interval: 110.4 to 151.3). Static Platt calibration fitted before the shift further reduces downstream value despite leaving discrimination unchanged. The findings show that ranking models by predictive accuracy can misallocate managerial attention when economic thresholds and resource constraints bind. DAAV provides managers, analytics teams, and governance functions with a transparent, decision-centered complement to conventional predictive metrics for model selection and deployment under temporal shift.

Article Details

Section

Regular Paper

Author Biography

Kwan Hong Tan, Singapore University of Social Sciences

Dr Tan Kwan Hong serves in professorship, lecturing, and supervisory capacities at multiple global universities, including the University of West London (UK), the University of Suffolk (UK), the University of Northampton (UK), TETR College of Business (USA), European International University (France), Graham International University (USA), the European Institute of Management and Technology (Switzerland), Central Global University (Georgia), and the Singapore University of Social Sciences.

How to Cite

Beyond ROC-AUC: Decision-Adjusted Analytical Value for Capacity-Constrained Management Analytics under Temporal Distribution Shift. (2026). International Journal of Management and Data Analytics (IJMADA), 6(1), 414-431. https://doi.org/10.68485/ijmada.20266162

References

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

Brier, G. W. (1950). Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review, 78(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2

Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785-794). https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Hybrid intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(5), 637-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00595-2

Donti, P. L., Amos, B., & Kolter, J. Z. (2017). Task-based end-to-end model learning in stochastic optimization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5484-5494.

Drummond, C., & Holte, R. C. (2006). Cost curves: An improved method for visualizing classifier performance. Machine Learning, 65, 95-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-006-8199-5

Elmachtoub, A. N., & Grigas, P. (2022). Smart "Predict, then Optimize". Management Science, 68(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3922

Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). On calibration of modern neural networks. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 70, 1321-1330. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/guo17a.html

Hand, D. J. (2009). Measuring classifier performance: A coherent alternative to the area under the ROC curve. Machine Learning, 77(1), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-009-5119-5

Hernandez-Orallo, J., Flach, P. A., & Ferri, C. (2012). A unified view of performance metrics: Translating threshold choice into expected classification loss. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 2813-2869. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v13/hernandez-orallo12a.html

Kleinberg, J., Lakkaraju, H., Leskovec, J., Ludwig, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2018). Human decisions and machine predictions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1), 237-293. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx032

Kotary, J., Fioretto, F., Van Hentenryck, P., & Wilder, B. (2021). End-to-end constrained optimization learning: A survey. Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 4475-4482. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/610

Mandi, J., Kotary, J., Berden, S., Mulamba, M., Bucarey, V., Guns, T., & Fioretto, F. (2024). Decision-focused learning: Foundations, state of the art, benchmark and future opportunities. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 80, 1623-1701. https://doi.org/10.1613/JAIR.1.15320

Moro, S., Rita, P., & Cortez, P. (2014a). Bank Marketing [Dataset]. UCI Machine Learning Repository. https://doi.org/10.24432/C5K306

Moro, S., Cortez, P., & Rita, P. (2014b). A data-driven approach to predict the success of bank telemarketing. Decision Support Systems, 62, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.03.001

Ovadia, Y., Fertig, E., Ren, J., Nado, Z., Sculley, D., Nowozin, S., Dillon, J., Lakshminarayanan, B., & Snoek, J. (2019). Can you trust your model's uncertainty? Evaluating predictive uncertainty under dataset shift. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 13991-14002.

Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825-2830.

Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2001). Robust classification for imprecise environments. Machine Learning, 42(3), 203-231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007601015854

Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072

Saerens, M., Latinne, P., & Decaestecker, C. (2002). Adjusting the outputs of a classifier to new a priori probabilities: A simple procedure. Neural Computation, 14(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976602753284446

Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257

Tan, K. H. (2026). Shift-responsive conformal ensemble for reliable selective classification under distribution shift. International Journal of Progressive Research in Engineering Management and Science, 6(7), 1664-1675. https://doi.org/10.58257/IJPREMS54397

Vickers, A. J., & Elkin, E. B. (2006). Decision curve analysis: A novel method for evaluating prediction models. Medical Decision Making, 26(6), 565-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X06295361

Wilder, B., Dilkina, B., & Tambe, M. (2019). Melding the data-decisions pipeline: Decision-focused learning for combinatorial optimization. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(01), 1658-1665. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011658

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.