Predictive Maintenance Adoption in Southeast Asia’s Aviation MRO: A Systematic TOE-Based Analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aviation industry in Southeast Asia (SEA) is undergoing significant digital transformation, with Predictive Maintenance (PdM) emerging as a critical innovation within Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) operations. Despite global advancements in PdM technologies, such as Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, artificial intelligence (AI) analytics, and digital twins, adoption across SEA remains inconsistent. This study investigates PdM adoption across the region’s MRO sector using the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework to assess national readiness levels, systemic barriers, and strategic enablers. Employing a qualitative methodology that integrates a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Document Analysis of scholarly and industry sources published between 2013 and 2024, the study reveals stark disparities in PdM maturity. Singapore and Malaysia exhibit high readiness due to advanced infrastructure, coordinated policy support, and public–private collaboration. In contrast, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia face persistent challenges related to fragmented governance, workforce capability gaps, and minimal integration of PdM tools into core operations. Organizational inertia, technical skill shortages, and regulatory inconsistencies are identified as critical inhibitors. The TOE framework proves effective in capturing the interplay of contextual factors influencing PdM implementation in highly regulated, safety-critical industries. The findings inform a strategic roadmap emphasizing workforce development, regulatory harmonization, and cross-sector alignment as prerequisites for successful PdM adoption. Future research should focus on in-depth case studies, empirical validation of TOE constructs, and actor-specific adoption dynamics to advance theoretical and practical understanding.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Praxie.com, “The Role of Predictive Maintenance in Aviation,” Praxie, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://praxie.com/predictive-maintenance-in-aviation/
Rolls-Royce, “TotalCare: Keeping aircraft engines at peak performance,” Rolls-Royce, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/our-stories/discover/2017/totalcare.aspx
Boeing, “Boeing at the Forefront of Revolution in Predictive Maintenance,” Boeing, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://tinyurl.com/56y86a9n
S. Lang, “AVIATAR – Deep dive into prediction with AVIATAR with in-service examples from airlines,” PHM Society Asia-Pacific Conference, vol. 4, no. 1, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.36001/phmap.2023.v4i1.3776
M. Pelt, K. Stamoulis, and A. Apostolidis, “Data analytics case studies in the maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) industry,” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 304, p. 04005, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201930404005
A. C. Budiman, R. Nurcahyo, A. Ma’aram, and M. Habiburrahman, “Factor Analysis and Cost Calculation of Solar Energy Implementation in Aviation Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO),” Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, vol. 12, no. 4, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i4.3487
F. Franciscus, “Development of roadmap for the aircraft maintenance industry, maintenance repair & overhaul/MRO, in Indonesia,” Journal of Innovation and Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 76–83, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31629/jit.v2i2.4277
Guiguzi, “Vietnam’s vision of growth in the aeronautical industry,” Open Science Framework (OSF) Preprints, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/4yrgs
P. Ayeni, T. Baines, H. Lightfoot, and P. Ball, “State of the art of ‘lean’ in the aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul industry,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf., vol. 225, no. 11, pp. 2108–2123, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405411407122
C. Llopis, “How Predictive Maintenance Enhances Aircraft Performance and Reliability,” EXSYN Aviation Solutions, Aug. 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://exsyn.com/blog/predictivemaintenance-enhances-aircraftpreformancereliability
D. Dundas, “From reactive to predictive practices,” AviTrader, Jan. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://avitrader.com/2025/01/15/from-reactive-to-predictive-practices/
A. Singh, “Types of sensors used in aircraft and their role in predictive maintenance,” AZoSensors, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.azosensors.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=1614
C. McFarlane, “How the Internet of Things is transforming aviation operations,” OASES, Aug. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://oases.aero/blog/how-iot-affects-aviation-operations/
M. Monisha, “Predictive maintenance of aircraft components based on sensor data-driven approach: A review,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 687–693, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.53843
R. Fedorov, D. Pavlyuk, and L. Rozhkova, “Screening out candidates for predictive analytics in maintenance, repairs, and overhaul organizations,” in Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 1, pp. 181–191, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96196-1_15
M. Mitici, I. Pater, A. Barros, and Z. Zeng, “Dynamic predictive maintenance for multiple components using data-driven probabilistic RUL prognostics: The case of turbofan engines,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 236, p. 109199, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109199
I. Pater and M. Mitici, “Predictive maintenance for multi-component systems of repairables with remaining-useful-life prognostics and a limited stock of spare components,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 210, p. 107761, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107761
I. Stanton, K. Munir, A. Ikram, and M. El-Bakry, “Predictive maintenance analytics and implementation for aircraft: Challenges and opportunities,” Syst. Eng., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 404–416, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21651
S. Nam, S. Choi, G. Edell, A. De, and W.-K. Song, “Comparative analysis of the aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) industry in Northeast Asian countries: A suggestion for the development of Korea’s MRO industry,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 1159, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021159
Z. Yordanova, “Barriers to organizations adopting digital transformation for driving eco-innovation and sustainable performance,” in Opportunities and Challenges for Digital and Green Transition in Organizations, Springer, 2023, pp. 197–209. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53025-8_12
Ranjan, P., Chaudhari, S., & Singh, S. (2023). Challenges in the Digital Transformation of Business Processes towards Creating a Paperless Environment: A Case Study of an Aircraft Manufacturing Firm. In 2023 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit (E-TEMS) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/E-TEMS57541.2023.10424597
Kutnjak, A., & Pihir, I. (2020). Challenges, issues, barriers and problems in digital transformation – Systematic literature review. Conference proceedings. file:///C:/Users/PHILSCA/Downloads/1094688.2019_Simic_Stremy_Zajdela_Hrustek_Proceedings_IDS_2019%20(2).pdf
Maratis, J., Ramadan, A., Az Zahra, A. R., Ahsanitaqwim, R., & Bennet, D. (2023). Navigating the challenges of digital transformation in a traditional organization. APTISI Transactions on Management (ATM), 8(3), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.33050/atm.v8i3.2349
Ogundare, T. O., Ibokette, A. I., Anyebe, A. P., & During, A. D. (2024). The economic and regulatory challenges of implementing digital twins and autonomous vessels in U.S. maritime fleet modernization. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(11), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24nov075
Thumati, B. T., Subramania, H. S., Shastri, R., Kumar, K., Hessner, N., Villa, V., Page, A., & Followell, D. (2020). Large-Scale Data Integration for Facility Analytics: Challenges and Opportunities. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 4679–4688). https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378440
Scott, J. E. (2007). An e-transformation study using the Technology-Organization-Environment framework. In Proceedings of the 20th Bled eConference: eMergence: Merging and Emerging Technologies, Processes, and Institutions (pp. 1–14). [Bled eConference].
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2013). Analysing challenges, barriers and CSF of e-government adoption. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161311325350
Abd Wahab, N. H., Hasikin, K., Lai, K., Xia, K., Bei, L., Huang, K., & Wu, X. (2024). Systematic Review of Predictive Maintenance and Digital Twin Technologies: Challenges, Opportunities, and Best Practices. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e1943. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1943
Alomar, I., & Yatskiv (Jackiva), I. (2023). Digitalization in aircraft maintenance processes. Aviation, 27(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2023.18923
Dangut, M. D., Skaf, Z., & Jennions, I. (2020). An integrated machine learning model for aircraft components rare failure prognostics with log-based dataset. ISA Transactions, 103, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2020.05.001
C. Dibsdale, Aerospace Predictive Maintenance. Warrendale, PA: SAE International, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/9780768094275
M. Efthymiou, K. McCarthy, C. Markou, and J. F. O’Connell, “An exploratory research on blockchain in aviation: The case of Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) organizations,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 2643, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052643
R. Fedorov and D. Pavlyuk, “Economic efficiency of data-driven fault diagnosis and prognosis techniques in maintenance and repair organizations,” in Digital Transformation and Global Society, 2019, pp. 41–52. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44610-9_4
R. Fedorov, D. Pavlyuk, L. Rozhkova, and T. Tyncherov, “Objective functions of predictive models in maintenance, repairs, and overhaul organizations,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Digital Transformation and Global Society, 2021, pp. 144–154. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68476-1_14
F. Franciscus, “Review the facility development of aircraft tire retreading in Indonesia,” Jurnal Teknik Komputer, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 15–23, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.35894/jtk.v5i2.10
K. K. Ganguly, “Understanding the challenges of the adoption of blockchain technology in the logistics sector: The TOE framework,” Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., vol. 38, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2036333
S. Heim et al., “Predictive maintenance on aircraft and applications with a digital twin,” in Proc. 2020 IEEE Int. Conf. Big Data (Big Data), 2020, pp. 5692–5699. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378433
I. Kabashkin and V. Perekrestov, “Ecosystem of Aviation Maintenance: Transition from Aircraft Health Monitoring to Health Management Based on IoT and AI Synergy,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 11, p. 4394, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114394
A. I. Khan, “Utilizing data analytics for predictive maintenance in manufacturing: A systematic review on achieving operational excellence,” Innovatech Eng. J., vol. 1, no. 1, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.70937/itej.v1i01.7
K. Y. Kommanaboina, “Real-time predictive maintenance in manufacturing: Leveraging IoT and big data analytics,” J. Mater. Sci. Manuf. Res., vol. 2, no. 3, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.47363/jmsmr/2022(3)e101
A. Kumar, R. Singh, and S. Swain, “Adoption of Technology Applications in Organized Retail Outlets in India: A Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Model,” Glob. Bus. Rev., vol. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211072382
J. Lee, J. Singh, M. Azamfar, and V. Pandhare, “Industrial AI and predictive analytics for smart manufacturing systems,” in Industrial AI Applications, 2020, pp. 189–205. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-820027-8.00008-3
J. C.-F. Li, “The Roles of Individual Perception in Technology Adoption at the Organizational Level: A Behavioral Model versus the TOE Framework,” J. Syst. Manag. Sci., vol. 14, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.33168/jsms.2020.0308
A. Madaki, K. Ahmad, D. Singh, and A. A. Abdullah, “Unleashing the Impact of IT Integration Implementation in Public Sector Organizations through the Lens of TOE: A Review,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Electr. Eng. Inform., 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEI59426.2023.10346696
L. Metso and N. E. Thenent, “Characteristics of Maintenance 4.0 and Their Reflection in Aircraft Engine MRO,” in Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXIV, 2020, pp. 331–336. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57745-2_42
P. Mokganya, R. Webber-Youngman, J. Uys, and J. Olwagen, “The role of leadership in technology adoption in the South African mining industry,” J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2220/2024
S. Nadaf, “AI for predictive maintenance in industries,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 128–132, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.63442
J. H. Oeppen Hill, A. Thomas, R. Mason-Jones, and S. N. El-Kateb, “The implementation of a Lean Six Sigma framework to enhance operational performance in an MRO facility,” Int. J. Lean Six Sigma, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 555–576, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2017.1417179
M. Patel, J. Vasa, and B. Patel, “Predictive maintenance: A comprehensive analysis and future outlook,” in Proc. 2023 2nd Int. Conf. Futuristic Technol. (INCOFT), 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/INCOFT60753.2023.10425122
A. Plioutsias, K. Stamoulis, M. C. Papanikou, and R. J. de Boer, “Safety differently: A case study in an aviation Maintenance-Repair-Overhaul facility,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 314, p. 01002, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202031401002
P. Poór, J. Basl, and D. Ženíšek, “Assessing the predictive maintenance readiness of enterprises in the West Bohemian region,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 9, pp. 657–664, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.098
M. Z. Rafique, M. Haider, A. Raheem, M. N. Ab Rahman, and M. Amjad, “Essential elements for radio frequency identification (RFID) adoption for Industry 4.0 smart manufacturing in the context of Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework – A review,” Jurnal Kejuruteraan, vol. 34, no. 1, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2021-34(1)-01
Y. Ran, X. Zhou, P. Lin, Y. Wen, and R. Deng, “A survey of predictive maintenance: Systems, purposes and approaches,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1912.07383, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.07383
P. Saraswat and R. Agrawal, “Artificial intelligence as a key enabler for sustainable maintenance in the manufacturing industry: Scope & challenges,” Evergreen, vol. 2, no. 1, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5109/7162012
M. J. Scott, W. Verhagen, M. Bieber, and P. Marzocca, “A systematic literature review of predictive maintenance for the sustainment and operations of defence fixed-wing aircraft,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 18, p. 7070, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22187070
L. Setiyani and Y. Rostiani, “Analysis of E-commerce Adoption by SMEs Using the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) Model: A Case Study in Karawang, Indonesia,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Manag., vol. 2, no. 4, p. 32, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v2i4.246
T. Sivanuja and Y. Sandanayake, “Strategies to successfully implement the Industry 4.0 concept for predictive maintenance in facilities management,” FARU J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4038/faruj.v9i2.165
A. Spexet et al., “The connected hangar: Ubiquitous computing and aircraft maintenance,” Proc. UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct, pp. 244–249, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544793.3560353
Y. Sun, C.-W. Tan, K. H. Lim, T.-P. Liang, and Y.-H. Yeh, “Strategic contexts, strategic orientations and organisational technology adoption: A configurational approach,” Inf. Syst. J., vol. 5, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12497
H. Taherdoost, “A critical review of blockchain acceptance models - Blockchain technology adoption frameworks and applications,” Computers, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 24, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11020024
C. V. Thian, “Civil and Military Airworthiness Challenges in Asia,” Aviation, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 70–76, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3846/16487788.2015.1057993
E. Traini, G. Bruno, G. D'Antonio, and F. Lombardi, “Machine learning framework for predictive maintenance in milling,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 1116–1121, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.172
C. Wang, I. Fan, and S. King, “A Review of Digital Twins for Vehicle Predictive Maintenance Systems,” SAE Tech. Paper Ser., no. 2023-01-1024, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/2023-01-1024
H. Zheng, A. R. C. Paiva, and C. Gurciullo, “Advancing from predictive maintenance to intelligent maintenance with AI and IIoT,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2002.03856, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.03856