Relationship of UK with the foreign markets after Brexit: Challenges and opportunities

Main Article Content

Natalia Minut
Asim Majeed
Paul Bocij
Ayesha Asim
Mahmood Ali

Abstract

The United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union in 2016, a challenging process that took place. Brexit was finalized on 31st January 2020, and after the transition period, the United Kingdom is not part of the European Union. The purpose of this research is to fill the gaps concerning how Brexit has and will affect the United Kingdom’s relationship with the European Union. The researcher conducts a study investigating the disruptive effects of Brexit and some of the organizational responses undertaken by companies in Britain. However, to conduct this study, the research focuses specifically on the Fortnum and Mason company as representing the retail industry. The chosen research method for this study is mixed-method research. This method will allow the researcher to acquire a broader picture of the topic under study. A pragmatic approach was used due to the study's nature as it is mainly grounded in the reality of many companies in the United Kingdom. This research paper will be valuable to retail firms and decision-makers who experience the uncertainties discussed in the study.

Article Details

How to Cite
Relationship of UK with the foreign markets after Brexit: Challenges and opportunities. (2021). International Journal of Management and Data Analytics, 1(2), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11527402
Section
Student Paper

How to Cite

Relationship of UK with the foreign markets after Brexit: Challenges and opportunities. (2021). International Journal of Management and Data Analytics, 1(2), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11527402

References

Arnorsson, A., & Zoega, G. (2018). On the causes of Brexit. European Journal of Political Economy, 55, 301-323. https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/16769/1/16769.pdf

Barros, A. C., Senna, P. P., Marchiori, I., Kalaitzi, D., & Balech, S. (2020). Scenario-driven supply chain charaterization using a multi-dimensional approach. In Next Generation Supply Chains (pp. 79-101). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63505-3_4

Berner, C. L., & Flage, R. (2017). Creating risk management strategies based on uncertain assumptions and aspects from assumption-based planning. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 167, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.009

Bowman, G., & MacKay, R. B. (2020). Scenario planning as strategic activity: A practice‐orientated approach. Futures & Foresight Science, 2(3-4), e32. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ffo2.32

Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., & Kohl, T. (2018). Consequences of Brexit and options for a ‘Global Britain’. Papers in Regional Science, 97(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12343

Breinlich, H., Leromain, E., Novy, D., & Sampson, T. (2017). The Brexit vote, inflation and UK living standards. CEP Brexit Analysis, 11, 2-15. https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/untitled-120410-ea.pdf

Broadbent, B., Di Pace, F., Drechsel, T., Harrison, R., & Tenreyro, S. (2019). The Brexit vote, productivity growth and macroeconomic adjustments in the United Kingdom. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3464521

Carr-Wiggin, M. (2019). Fortnum & Mason: A shopping and cultural memory icon. https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-cr35-h465

Cole, A. P., & Trinh, Q. D. (2017). Secondary data analysis: techniques for comparing interventions and their limitations. Current opinion in urology, 27(4), 354-359. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000407

D'Ippolito, N., Rodrıguez, N., & Sardina, S. (2018). Fully observable non-deterministic planning as assumption-based reactive synthesis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 61, 593-621. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.5562

Fingleton, B., Olner, D., & Pryce, G. (2020). Estimating the local employment impacts of immigration: A dynamic spatial panel model. Urban Studies, 57(13), 2646-2662. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0042098019887916

Gibson, C. B. (2017). Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 193-223. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/23/1/6.html

Hantzsche, A., Kara, A., & Young, G. (2019). The economic effects of the UK government's proposed Brexit deal. The World Economy, 42(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12770

Henökl, T. (2018). How Brexit affects EU external action: The UK’s legacy in European international cooperation. Futures, 97, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.07.002

Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259-1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785

Ivy, J. (2019). Defining Your Methodology. Crafting Your Edge for Today's Job Market, 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-297-920191010

Jafari, Y., & Britz, W. (2020). Brexit: an economy-wide impact assessment on trade, immigration, and foreign direct investment. Empirica, 47(1), 17-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9418-6

Kleibert, J. M. (2020). Brexit geographies of transnational education: uncertainty,‘global Britain’and European (re-) integration. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1837222

Latorre, M. C., Olekseyuk, Z., & Yonezawa, H. (2020). Trade and foreign direct investment‐related impacts of Brexit. The World Economy, 43(1), 2-32. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3399942

Latorre, M. C., Olekseyuk, Z., Yonezawa, H., & Robinson, S. (2019). Brexit: Everyone loses, but Britain loses the most. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper, (19-5). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3345244_code356528.pdf?abstractid=3345244&mirid=1&type=2

Latorre, M. C., Olekseyuk, Z., Yonezawa, H., & Robinson, S. (2020). Making sense of Brexit losses: An in-depth review of macroeconomic studies. Economic Modelling, 89, 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.10.009

Lupan, R. (2019). Non-tariff regulations trends in the context of BREXIT and relation of United Kingdom and Republic of Moldova with european market. In Simpozion Ştiinţific Internaţional al Tinerilor Cercetători (pp. 57-63). https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/57-63_7.pdf

Magruk, A. (2017). Concept of uncertainty in relation to the foresight research. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 9(1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1515/emj-2017-0005

May, D., Arancibia, S., & Manning, L. (2020). Understanding UK farmers’ Brexit voting decision: A behavioural approach. Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.042

Palmu, M. (2020). Investigating the impact of Brexit on the exchange rate volatility of the pound sterling with respect to the Euro and the US dollar. https://lutpub.lut.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/161144/Bachelors_thesis_Palmu_Marcus.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Rutberg, S., & Bouikidis, C. D. (2018). Focusing on the fundamentals: A simplistic differentiation between qualitative and quantitative research. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(2), 209-213. http://www.homeworkgain.com/wp-content/uploads/edd/2019/09/20181009143525article2.pdf

Stephens, S. A., Bell, R. G., & Lawrence, J. (2017). Applying principles of uncertainty within coastal hazard assessments to better support coastal adaptation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 5(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse5030040

Vecchiato, R. (2019). Scenario planning, cognition, and strategic investment decisions in a turbulent environment. Long Range Planning, 52(5), 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2019.01.002.